- Updated: March 21, 2026
- 8 min read
Automating the OpenClaw Agent Evaluation Framework with CI/CD
Automating the OpenClaw Agent Evaluation Framework with CI/CD
You can fully automate the OpenClaw Agent Evaluation Framework by embedding its test suite into GitHub Actions or GitLab CI pipelines, capturing results as artifacts, and publishing reports directly to your repository’s UI.
1. Introduction
OpenClaw is a powerful, open‑source framework that evaluates AI agents against a suite of benchmark tasks. While running the framework manually is straightforward, modern DevOps teams demand repeatable, version‑controlled, and observable pipelines. This guide shows software developers and DevOps engineers how to integrate OpenClaw into continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows using both GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.
By the end of this article you will have:
- A ready‑to‑use repository structure for OpenClaw.
- Two fully functional CI configuration files.
- Best‑practice tips for scaling evaluations, handling secrets, and visualizing results.
2. Overview of the OpenClaw Agent Evaluation Framework
OpenClaw provides:
- Standardized tasks – from text generation to multi‑step reasoning.
- Metric collection – accuracy, latency, token usage, and custom scoring.
- Extensible plug‑ins – you can add new agents or datasets with minimal code.
The framework is language‑agnostic, but most teams run it inside a Docker container to guarantee reproducibility. When combined with CI/CD, each commit can trigger a fresh evaluation, ensuring that regressions are caught early.
3. Benefits of CI/CD Automation
Automating OpenClaw with CI/CD brings tangible advantages:
- Continuous Quality Gate – Fail the pipeline if an agent’s performance drops below a threshold.
- Traceability – Every result is tied to a commit SHA, making root‑cause analysis trivial.
- Scalability – Parallel jobs run on cloud runners, reducing total evaluation time.
- Visibility – Built‑in artifact storage and markdown reports keep stakeholders informed.
4. Prerequisites
Before you start, make sure you have the following:
- A GitHub or GitLab repository with
adminrights. - Docker installed locally (for testing) and access to a container registry (Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, or GitLab Container Registry).
- OpenClaw source code – clone from the official repo.
- API keys for any external LLM services you plan to evaluate (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic). Store them as encrypted secrets.
5. Step‑by‑step Guide
5.1 Set up the repository
Create a fresh repository (or use an existing one) and add the following layout:
├─ .github/
│ └─ workflows/
├─ .gitlab/
│ └─ ci/
├─ openclaw/
│ ├─ Dockerfile
│ ├─ requirements.txt
│ └─ scripts/
├─ .gitignore
└─ README.md
Place the official Dockerfile inside openclaw/. A minimal example:
FROM python:3.11-slim
WORKDIR /app
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
COPY . .
ENTRYPOINT ["python", "-m", "openclaw"]
5.2 Create a GitHub Actions workflow
Save the following file as .github/workflows/openclaw.yml. It builds the Docker image, runs the evaluation, and uploads a markdown report as an artifact.
name: OpenClaw CI
on:
push:
branches: [ main ]
pull_request:
branches: [ main ]
jobs:
evaluate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
actions: read
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Set up Docker Buildx
uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v2
- name: Log in to Docker Hub
uses: docker/login-action@v2
with:
username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}
password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Build OpenClaw image
run: |
docker build -t ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }} ./openclaw
- name: Push image
run: |
docker push ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }}
- name: Run evaluation
env:
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
run: |
docker run --rm \
-e OPENAI_API_KEY \
-e ANTHROPIC_API_KEY \
${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }} \
--output results.json
- name: Generate markdown report
run: |
python ./openclaw/scripts/report_generator.py results.json > report.md
- name: Upload report
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: openclaw-report
path: report.md
5.3 Create a GitLab CI pipeline
For GitLab, add .gitlab-ci.yml at the repository root. The logic mirrors the GitHub workflow but uses GitLab’s native syntax.
stages:
- build
- test
- report
variables:
IMAGE_TAG: "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:${CI_COMMIT_SHA}"
build:
stage: build
image: docker:latest
services:
- docker:dind
script:
- docker login -u "$CI_REGISTRY_USER" -p "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD" $CI_REGISTRY
- docker build -t $IMAGE_TAG ./openclaw
- docker push $IMAGE_TAG
evaluate:
stage: test
image: $IMAGE_TAG
variables:
OPENAI_API_KEY: "$OPENAI_API_KEY"
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: "$ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"
script:
- python -m openclaw --output results.json
report:
stage: report
image: python:3.11-slim
dependencies:
- evaluate
script:
- pip install -r openclaw/requirements.txt
- python openclaw/scripts/report_generator.py results.json > report.md
artifacts:
paths:
- report.md
expire_in: 1 week
5.4 Integrate OpenClaw evaluation steps
Both pipelines rely on a small helper script (report_generator.py) that transforms the raw JSON output into a human‑readable markdown table. Example snippet:
import json, sys
data = json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))
lines = ["| Agent | Task | Score | Latency (ms) |", "|---|---|---|---|"]
for entry in data:
lines.append(f"| {entry['agent']} | {entry['task']} | {entry['score']} | {entry['latency']} |")
print("\n".join(lines))
This script can be extended to push results to a dashboard, Slack channel, or the UBOS OpenClaw hosting page for centralized monitoring.
5.5 Capture and report results
After the pipeline finishes, you’ll find a report.md artifact. In GitHub, it appears under the “Artifacts” section of the workflow run; in GitLab, it’s listed under “Job Artifacts”. Teams can:
- Download the markdown and embed it in a Pull Request comment.
- Configure a
pagesjob to publish the report as a static site. - Use the Enterprise AI platform by UBOS to ingest the JSON and generate dashboards automatically.
6. Sample Configuration Files
.github/workflows/openclaw.yml
name: OpenClaw CI
on:
push:
branches: [ main ]
pull_request:
branches: [ main ]
jobs:
evaluate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v2
- name: Log in to Docker Hub
uses: docker/login-action@v2
with:
username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}
password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Build image
run: docker build -t ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }} ./openclaw
- name: Push image
run: docker push ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }}
- name: Run evaluation
env:
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
run: |
docker run --rm -e OPENAI_API_KEY ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USER }}/openclaw:${{ github.sha }} --output results.json
- name: Generate report
run: python ./openclaw/scripts/report_generator.py results.json > report.md
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: openclaw-report
path: report.md
.gitlab-ci.yml
stages:
- build
- test
- report
variables:
IMAGE_TAG: "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:${CI_COMMIT_SHA}"
build:
stage: build
image: docker:latest
services:
- docker:dind
script:
- docker login -u "$CI_REGISTRY_USER" -p "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD" $CI_REGISTRY
- docker build -t $IMAGE_TAG ./openclaw
- docker push $IMAGE_TAG
evaluate:
stage: test
image: $IMAGE_TAG
script:
- python -m openclaw --output results.json
report:
stage: report
image: python:3.11-slim
dependencies:
- evaluate
script:
- pip install -r openclaw/requirements.txt
- python openclaw/scripts/report_generator.py results.json > report.md
artifacts:
paths:
- report.md
expire_in: 1 week
7. Best‑Practice Tips
- Cache Docker layers. Add a
--cache-fromflag in the build step to speed up subsequent runs. - Parallelize tasks. Split the benchmark suite into independent jobs using matrix strategies (GitHub) or
parallel(GitLab) to reduce total runtime. - Secure secrets. Store API keys in
GitHub SecretsorGitLab CI/CD variableswithprotectedflag enabled. - Fail fast on regressions. Add a
thresholdcheck inreport_generator.pyand exit with a non‑zero status if any score falls below the acceptable level. - Version the evaluation data. Tag each successful run with a Git tag (e.g.,
v1.2‑eval‑2024‑03‑21) so you can compare historical trends. - Leverage UBOS automation. The Workflow automation studio can orchestrate multi‑repo evaluations and aggregate results across teams.
- Use the UBOS platform overview to understand how the evaluation pipeline fits into a broader AI‑ops strategy: UBOS platform overview.
- Consider pricing. If you need more concurrent runners, review the UBOS pricing plans for scalable compute.
- Explore AI marketing agents. For teams that also need marketing automation, check out AI marketing agents that can be triggered after a successful evaluation.
8. Conclusion & Next Steps
Automating OpenClaw with CI/CD transforms a periodic manual test into a continuous quality gate that scales with your development velocity. By following the steps above, you gain immediate visibility into agent performance, enforce regression thresholds, and create an audit trail tied to every code change.
Next actions you might consider:
- Integrate the generated markdown report into a Web app editor on UBOS to build a custom dashboard.
- Extend the pipeline to push results to a data lake for long‑term analytics.
- Adopt the UBOS partner program for dedicated support and early access to new AI evaluation tools.
9. Related UBOS Resource
For a deeper dive into hosting and visualizing OpenClaw results on the UBOS platform, read the dedicated guide on hosting OpenClaw with UBOS. It walks you through setting up a persistent endpoint, configuring role‑based access, and embedding live charts into your internal wiki.